William Katz: Urgent Agenda
|
||
|
WHITEWASH – AT 7:05 P.M. ET: I've been disappointed in some of the reporting by the Washington Post following the Arizona tragedy. The Post's editorial page has been restrained and responsible, in contrast to that of The out-of-control New York Times, but the reporting still has the tinge of the view from the left. The paper has made important strides in the last two years to free itself from the grip of biased reporting. But attempts to whitewash the actions of Arizona authorities over the years, in their reaction to complaints about Saturday's alleged shooter, are a bit of a setback. Consider:
Look, if there was any obvious foreshadowing, the guy could have been detained. The problem here is that we're talking about 12 cases, plus 5 cases from the college he attended. At what point is there enough information to place in the federal database, which would have prevented this guy from buying a gun? The story lets the sheriff's office off too easily, especially since this sheriff has become a liberal darling in the last three days, announcing his political views for the world to hear.
I love the term "small-time drug arrest. That is an editorial opinion. Why wasn't that drug arrest in the federal database? I don't know the answer, but the newspeople should have asked.
Combine this with the five reports from his college of class disruptions and frightening behavior, and we have a case that should have allowed official intervention. It's been reported that Arizona has a low bar for such intervention, yet nothing was done. And the story doesn't even delve into it. There is some good factual reporting here, but the mainstream media has been far too lax in questioning how a man with the alleged shooter's background got so far without any clamping down by authorities. January 12, 2011 |
|